The bigger problem of AI adoption isn't tooling or data, it's ‘AI illiteracy’ at the leadership level.
The kind of questions we ask reflects how much we know. And
too often, the questions reveal a dangerous gap:
1️⃣ Misunderstanding ML like
software engineering
“I will give you 10 samples, can you build a model?”
“You have trained a model on this data, why can't you retrain it by each
category?”
“You already have the architecture, isn't that half the job?”
In software, when you build an order placement API, it’s
reusable, you can lift and shift it across regions.
But in AI, the model trained on one dataset doesn’t behave
the same when trained on a subset.
👉
Data imbalances matter. Feature distribution matters. What works in one set
may break in another.
2️⃣ Oversimplified expectations
“Can we retrain the model every day?”
“Let’s schedule model updates at the end of each day.”
Nobody trains models every day. That’s not how MLOps,
retraining windows, or data quality cycles work.
3️⃣ Confidently asking the
wrong questions
The kind of questions we ask reflects our AI awareness rate.
The problem isn’t curiosity, it’s confidence in assumptions without
understanding the complexity behind them.
4️⃣ Biases disguised as
"opinions"
In many leadership discussions, I observe a mix of:
- Strong
opinions shaped by past software patterns
- Lack
of exposure to ML trade-offs
- Forcing
timelines and expectations AI can't meet, yet
🔁 This requires
unlearning, openness, and re-learning.
AI won't fail because it’s flawed. It will fail when leaders assume how it
works — and miss how it actually works.
Let’s not just adopt AI. Let’s understand it.
A little learning, backed by humility, goes a long way.
Titles don’t validate assumptions. Understanding does.
#AILiteracy #AILeadership #AIAdoption #MLReality
#AIExpectations #EnterpriseAI #TechAwareness #UnlearnToLearn #ResponsibleAI
#AIThinking #AIProductLeadership #MLOpsReality #DataMatters
No comments:
Post a Comment